Methodology
Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM-CGS)
Our analysis uses the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM), a global market equilibrium model that combines economic, energy, land use, and climate systems to analyze the interactions between human activities and global environmental changes. It is an open-source community model developed over 40 years and maintained at PNNL/JGCRI (College Park, MD). The download link and documentation is available at: http://jgcri.github.io/gcam-doc/toc.html.
Other open source tools used in this analysis
- gcamreport: tool for processing scenario output from the GCAM model into a dataset aligned with Integrated Assessment Modeling Consortium (IAMC) standards. Additional information is available at: https://github.com/bc3LC/gcamreport
- rhistiamc: tool for aggregating and processing historical reference data into the IAMC format for comparison with GCAM (or other IAM) scenario output. Additional information is available at: https://github.com/umd-cgs/rhistiamc
Data Use
Our analysis uses 100 year global warming potentials (GWP) from IPCC’s fourth assessment report (AR4), and for historical data uses the country-reported dataset from PRIMAP-hist (Gütschow et al. 2025). For electricity emissions, the historical data from EMBER is an estimate for total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, whereas scenario data includes only CO2 emissions, which explains part of the discrepancies in Figure 1 of many country pages.
For sectoral disaggregation of emissions, we use the differentiation into the four major gases, as well as separating the Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) and electricity CO2 emissions in figures 1, and in the text furthermore discuss the largest ‘sectors’ of greenhouse gases between the following: Energy supply / Electricity CO2, Industry CO2, Buildings CO2 (Residential and Commercial), Transport CO2, LULUCF CO2, total CH4, total N2O and F-Gases. This harmonized set of ‘sectoral’ contributors is chosen to provide meaningful disaggregation of total greenhouse gas emissions for all countries that is common across countries (while for specific countries a different disaggregation could have advantages, e.g. further disaggregating methane emissions into sectors for countries with large methane contributions.)
Scenarios Design
The high-ambition scenarios for most countries are developed based on the Net Zero 2050 (or 1.5°C) scenario using GCAM from NGFS 2024, with additional country-specific adjustments made in cases where particular model dynamics like electricity demand projections appear implausible based on latest data.
The Net Zero 2050 scenario has a 50% chance of limiting average global warming to below 1.5°C by 2100, with an overshoot likely occurring around mid-century. Global CO2 emissions reach or approach zero in 2050, and countries with a political commitment to a net zero target meet the target in their respective target year (2050, 2060, or 2070). Some jurisdictions, such as the US, EU, UK, Canada, Australia, and Japan, reach net zero for all GHGs. Australia and the EU are not standalone regions in GCAM; therefore we use downscaled scenario results for modeling from the Australia_NZ and EU_12, EU_15 and Europe_Non_EU regions, respectively.
A different set of scenarios with detailed sectoral policy modeling are used for some countries. Additional bespoke scenarios are developed using GCAM-CGS for China, Indonesia, US and Canada. Both high ambition and current policies scenarios are developed for China, US and Canada using the latest available policy information.
Cross-Cutting Data
- Ember, “Electricity Data Explorer - Open Source Global Electricity Data,” Ember, 2025,
https://ember-climate.org/data/data-tools/data-explorer/. - GEM, “Global Coal Plant Tracker (GCPT),” Global Energy Monitor (GEM), January 2025,
https://globalenergymonitor.org/projects/global-coal-plant-tracker/GEM, “Global Coal Plant Tracker (GCPT).” - GEM. “Global Oil and Gas Plant Tracker.” Global Energy Monitor (GEM), January 2025.
https://globalenergymonitor.org/projects/global-oil-gas-plant-tracker/. - Gütschow, Johannes, Mika Pflüger, and Daniel Busch. “The PRIMAP-Hist National Historical Emissions Time Series (1750-2023) v2.6.1.” Version 2.6.1. Zenodo, March 13, 2025.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15016289. - Hoesly, Rachel, Steven J Smith, Hamza Ahsan, et al., “CEDS V_2025_03_18 Gridded Data 0.5 Degree.” Version v_2025_03_18. Zenodo, March 18, 2025.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15001544. - NGFS. “NGFS Climate Scenarios for Central Banks and Supervisors - Phase V.” The Central Banks and Supervisors Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS), 2024.
https://www.ngfs.net/en/publications-and-statistics/publications/ngfs-climate-scenarios-central-banks-and-supervisors-phase-v. - UNFCCC, “Nationally Determined Contributions Registry,” UNFCCC,
https://unfccc.int/NDCREG.
Relevant Research
Global
- Risks of Relying on Uncertain Carbon Dioxide Removal in Climate Policy
- Global Methane Abatement Solutions Tracker (G-MAST)
- Advancing Equitable Value Chains for the Global Hydrogen Economy
- Enhancing Global Ambition For 2035: Assessment of High-Ambition Country Pathways
- Feasibility of peak temperature targets in light of institutional constraints
- Overview of Methane Mitigation Policies in Global Key Emitters Beyond the United States and China
- State Of Global Coal Power 2023
- Can updated climate pledges limit warming well below 2°C?
- Energy System Transitions and Low-Carbon Pathways in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, EU-28, India, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russia and the United States
- Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?
Australia
- Analyzing Sectoral Policies for Deep Decarbonization: the Case of National Freight Transportation
- The State of Global Coal Power Factsheet Series: Australia
Brazil
Canada
China
- United States and China Anthropogenic Methane Emissions: A Review of Uncertainties and Collaborative Opportunities
- Reducing Transition Costs Towards Carbon Neutrality of China’s Coal Power Plants
- Carbon Dioxide Removal Policies and Practices in the U.S. and China
- Provincial Analysis on Wind and Solar Investment Needs Towards China's Carbon Neutrality
- Enhancing Global Ambition for 2035: Assessment of High-Ambition Country PathwaysA
- A Comparative Review of Methane Policies of the United States and China in the Context of US-China Climate Cooperation
- The State of Global Coal Power Factsheet Series: China
EU
- The State of Global Coal Power Factsheet Series: Germany
- The State of Global Coal Power Factsheet Series: Poland
- Strategies to Transition Away from Russian Gas and Deliver Climate Goals in Germany
India
- Implications of an Emission Trading Scheme for India’s Net-Zero Strategy: A Modelling-Based Assessment
- The State of Global Coal Power Factsheet Series: India
Indonesia
- Mining, Manufacturing, and Markets: An Analysis of Five Years of Electric Vehicle Regulation, Investment, and Industry Development in Indonesia
- Growing Strong, Growing Green, Growing Renewables: Tripling Renewables and Doubling the Pace of Efficiency Improvement by 2030 in Indonesia
- Navigating SDG 8 in the Decarbonizing Landscape of Emerging Economies: A Case Study of Indonesia
- Indonesia’s Decarbonization Plans Diagnostic: A Policy Paper
- 1.5°C-Aligned Coal Power Transition Pathways in Indonesia: Additional Strategies Beyond the Comprehensive Investment and Policy Plan (CIPP)
- The State of Global Coal Power Factsheet Series: Indonesia
Japan
ROK
- Evaluating a High Ambition Pathway for Decarbonization in the Republic of Korea
- Korea’s National Carbon Neutrality Plan and 10th Electricity Basic Plan are Not Aligned with the Global 1.5°c Limit
- The State of Global Coal Power Factsheet Series: South Korea
Mexico
South Africa
USA
- U.S. Clean Energy Policy Rollbacks: The Economic and Public Health Impacts Across States
- Substantial Air Quality and Health Co-benefits from Combined Federal and Subnational Climate Actions in the United States
- Advancing U.S. Climate Action under Federal Policy Rollbacks
- U.S. Climate Pathways for 2035 with Strong Non-Federal Leadership
- Toward 2035: Forging A High-Ambition U.S. Climate Pathway
- High-Ambition Climate Action in All Sectors Can Achieve a 65% Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction in the United States by 2035
- A Multi-Model Study to Inform the United States’ 2035 NDC
- Leading the Way To Greater 2035 Climate Ambition: A Snapshot of Current State-Level Initiatives
- The State of Global Coal Power Factsheet Series: United States